Friday, January 02, 2009



2009 New Year in Manila

I entertain the idea that those who know that I dabble in astrology expect me to come up with periodic forecasts of things to come in our lives. Under this self-imposed premise, I try to figure out how to generate data as bases of any forecast I have to make. Thus, I study beginnings.


In astrology, beginnings are supposed to foreshadow things to come. The destiny of a person or entity is supposed to be uncovered from the location and distribution of specific heavenly bodies during a very definite date, time and place.


In the case of the incoming year, when is the Beginning that will present to me the data I need to interpret with the help of notes, books and the internet? Astrologers use the Spring Equinox – when the Sun crosses a specific spot in the heavens – to determine what is to happen to the world, or to a country. But Spring will still be some time in March or April, depending on what method of astrology is practiced. Western astrologers use the Tropical Zodiac, which starts when the sun crosses the ecliptic in its apparent travel from south to north latitude. Eastern astrologers, on the other hand, use the Sidereal Zodiac when the sun conjoins a particular reference point in the skies. I initially wanted to follow the Eastern method and use the sidereal zodiac, but discovered that there are several points preferred by some astrologers, claiming certain advantages in their choices. To name a few, there’s the Fagan-Allen, the Lahiri, the Krishnamurti, the de Luce, and the Synetic Vernal Point of Aries (or SVP). Each of these systems has different methods of computing, resulting in differing patterns of planetary distributions with corresponding plethora of interpretations.


Add to this welter of systems the matter of determining when the beginning of the Year should be taken. In my previous foray into forecasting, I used the Tropical Zodiac and timed the onset of the year 2008 when the Sun conjoined in December 2007 the celestial coordinates of the Galactic Center. As a doomsayer, I wrote about a martial law regime to arise but which did not materialize. I rationalized, however, that even without the declaration of martial law, we now find ourselves in a regime concentrated on supposedly suppressing terrorism or the threat of it. In the process of saturating the horizon with uniformed personnel, both police and military, the embattled government maintains a pressure to suppress any sign of mass action against it. As well, we now have a government almost saturated with retired military and police generals running the executive department.


For this once, I use the horoscope of the midnight of New Year since this is the accepted beginning of the year in our country. (Some think this is also the start of the Chinese Year of the Ox, but this Lunar New Year is still to begin during the annular eclipse on January 26.) Come to think of it, does the day really begin at midnight? The Jews and the Muslims begin the day at sunset, because in Genesis it says “evening and morning, the first day.” Again, there is the matter of determining the time of sunset… but which I will not go into my discussion. I just accept that 2009 started at zero hour of January 1.


What does the New Year horoscope reveal to me? Most of the planets, except Saturn, are below the horizon, indicating a national preoccupation with internal affairs. However, without looking at the horoscope, anybody aware of current events cannot escape concluding that the international financial condition will truly force any country to concentrate on what to do to mitigate or prevent any unhappy development in the economy. So what’s the point of depending on astrology to show us what is to happen? The positioning of the planets, nonetheless, is supposed to show what specifics to expect. (Excuse my extensive use of astrological jargon if only to present to other astrologers the bases of my “forecast”.)


I am particularly intrigued by the clustering of aggressive Mars, unfathomable Pluto and irrational Lilith. My notes say that “Mars governs the military, soldiers and noted military and naval men, as well as signifies, terrorist attacks, industrial disputes, strikes and conflicts.” Pluto, in turn, is “the principle of metamorphosis and regeneration” and all “aspects of life that are carried on in the dark or hidden from public view.” On the other hand, Lilith or the Dark Moon “brings up deep and primal issues like repressed feelings of rejection and rage, refusal to submit.” These symbols are all in the Third House which concerns “all means of disseminating news and information, such as communication networks, internet, telephones, faxes, newspapers, magazines, ephemeral publications and periodicals.” The electronic age we are in makes the dissemination of information (or disinformation) and decisions very rapid.


Also an interesting cluster is the Moon or “the common people, women generally, crowds, and all matters of a common or public nature” flanked on both sides by Venus, symbol of women’s issues and family, as well as music and the arts, and by Neptune “linked with mobs, secret plots, sedition, fraud and swindling, all illicit undertakings, bogus companies, loss and vice.” All are in the Fifth House of “theatres, public houses, all places of amusement, entertainment and pleasure, of children, sexual concerns, and of sports, speculation, gambling”. The Moon’s presence here is indicative of a serious focus of public attention.


There is, as well, the positioning of Uranus, which “rules separation, scientific breakthroughs and discoveries, explosions, and anarchy” and “has a general influence over rioting and outbreaks of political tension” in the Sixth House of, among others, “public health or sickness; the national services: army, navy and Civil Service as servants of the country; workers and employees generally.” This is opposite (or balanced) to Saturn (the minor state executives and law enforcement authorities; civil service employees; land owners and mine operators; and elderly persons) in the Twelfth House (prisons, reformatories, criminals, spies, secret enemies of the country at home or abroad, and possibly secret societies and occult religions).


The placements of the planets in the Third, Sixth and Twelfth Houses bring to my mind the Guinea situation in Africa which columnist Amando Doronila recently discussed in the January 2 issue of the Philippine Daily Inquirer.


As a doomsayer, I am omitting any discussion about the Fourth House where Jupiter (religion and the judicial world) conjunct Mercury (communication, telecommunications, trade and commerce) are placed in the horoscope. Their presence gives a bright tone to the national situation, and may give us hope that the grim international economic situation will not touch us severely. On the other hand, also located in this House is the Sun, symbolizing the head of state and all persons of authority and distinction. It is in hostile relation to the Moon and Venus (see their meanings above).


Bringing all the above factors is the crux of the general situation for the country in 2009. Before daring to come up with a dire scenario, I shall indulge in a parable that is based on a recent event that happened in a golf course.


A powerful mayor, son of a cabinet member recently designated as a peace negotiator, was affronted when a 56-year-old commoner brought up his violation of a simple provision in the golf constitution. Insulted by not being recognized as a prominent politician, the mayor mauled the whistle-blower in broad daylight in a golf course where his father also was playing. When the old man’s son and daughter tried to break up the mauling, the mayor’s armed bodyguards joined the melee and the son also got beaten even as he knelt and pleaded mercy. The peace-negotiator-father did not lift a finger to stop his son, the mayor. (Later, he apologized, but not to the aggrieved party, and laid the blame for starting the incident on the victim.) The daughter tried to get witnesses to the mauling – the security guards of the golf course, and the receptionist – but all seemed to see the wisdom of the three-wise-monkey maxim. They feared repercussions from the powerful political family from Muslim Mindanao if they, in turn, become whistle-blowers. They saw nothing, heard nothing and will not speak about anything. We do not yet know how this incident will end. Perhaps, the mayor will merely receive a slight reprimand for his abuse of power. On the other hand, the old man will be thrown out of the golf club for bringing that elite social group into uneasy prominence, especially among bloggers in the world-wide internet.


By the way, the three wise monkeys in Japanese are Mizaru, eyes covered who sees no evil; Kikazaru, ears covered who hears no evil; and Iwazaru, mouth covered who speaks no evil. Today the three monkeys perversely "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil" by not wanting to be involved in a situation, or being blind to the immorality of an act in which they are involved. I venture to comment that this must be the maxim of the Supreme Court in its precedent-setting decision on the executive privilege of the president in any investigation conducted by the Senate. As well, whistle-blowers most often get punished instead because they violate the maxim by bringing out in public any evil they see or hear or speak of.


And the dela Paz (of the Peace) parable is a fit background for what is about to come.


I forecast something that will not come to pass: the people become tired of the sorry governance they apparently deserve, but are apathetic to act against due to the predominant influence exercised by the executive over the self-seeking lawmakers and the timid judiciary. The clamor for justice is deadened by the sound of clinking money, especially since the 2010 election fever starts to build up and extensive vote-buying occurs. Nonetheless, the discontent in the armed services boils over and a Guinea-like situation comes up triggered by the insistent effort of the people’s “representatives” to stretch and remove limits to their tenures.


My scenario does not happen. The top military hierarchy is too engrossed in preserving their pecuniary gains and does not dare change the status quo. If ever, an Army officer, holding a rank lower than that held by Senator Trillanes, will surface to “save” the nation. But as Doronila sadly ends his January 2 column, military regimes do not turn out less corrupt than those they replace.


Let us be happy in our ill-fated destiny. We deserve it.